Legal Opinion
Bajaj v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (Hud)
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 2, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-1149Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PARMINDER BAJAJ, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1149 (RDM) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Parminder Bajaj brings this civil action for discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment, and constructive discharge under (among others) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621–634, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehabilitation Act”),
29 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.