Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Starkist Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 31, 2020No. 3:19-cv-02561Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WARREN GARDNER, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02561-WHO 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING STARKIST'S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; GRANTING 10 STARKIST CO., et al., DONGWON'S MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 81, 82 12 13 Purchasers of StarKist Co. (“StarKist”) tuna from various states bring this class action 14 lawsuit alleging that StarKist promises consumers that its tuna products are dolphin-safe and 15 sustainably sourced and that those promises are false and misleading. See…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.