Legal Opinion

Schenley Industries, Inc. v. Curtis

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 23, 1959No. 161959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

152 A.2d 300 (1959)

SCHENLEY INDUSTRIES, INC., a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendant Below, Appellant,

v.

Caryl M. CURTIS, a Petitioner in Consolidated Action No. 1042 Below, Appellee.

No. 161959.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

June 23, 1959.

Aaron Finger, of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, for defendant below, appellant.

Caryl M. Curtis, pro se, appellee.

Before SOUTHERLAND, C. J., and WOLCOTT and BRAMHALL, JJ.

BRAMHALL, Justice.

This appeal relates to the timeliness of a written demand for payment of his stock by a stockholder dissenting from a merger of two corporations. The demand was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago Corp. v. MundsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  2. In re Northeastern Water Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
  3. Schenley Industries, Inc. v. CurtisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alabama By-Products Corp. v. Cede & Co. Ex Rel. Shearson Lehman Bros.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  2. Raab v. Villager Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  3. Nelson v. Frank E. Best Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
  4. Schneyer v. Shenandoah Oil CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
  5. Reimsnider v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API