Legal Opinion

Zimpfer v. Aramark Management Services, Lp

District Court, D. Utah

Decided June 24, 2011No. Case 2:10-CV-1236 TSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

TED STEWART, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Court has before it Defendant AR-AMARK Management Services, LP’s (“ARAMARK”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Chris Zimpfer’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Mr. Zimpfer”) Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). 1 Plaintiffs Complaint brings a single cause of action for unlawful retaliatory discharge under Title VII. 2 ARA-MARK contends that Plaintiffs Complaint fails to plead a prima facie case for relief under Title VII for retaliation. Specifically, Aramark contends that Plaintiffs retaliation claim…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Stephens County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  2. Holdaway v. Provo River Water Users AssociationDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
  3. Reznik v. inContactDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API