Sokolski v. Bleistift
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Abraham Sokolski and another against Abram I. Bleistift. From a judgment for defendant on a verdict, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiffs appeal.
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs brought this action to recover the sum of $400 as brokers’ commissions. It is undisputed that the plaintiffs were employed by the defendant, at first, to procure a tenant for certain premises owned by him, and that he agreed that if the premises were leased he would pay the plaintiffs $200 commission therefor. The plaintiffs procured a proposed tenant; but, when the parties met, they failed to agree upon the terms of the lease, and none was made. The plaintiffs claim that the failure to make the lease was by reason of the defendant having imposed other conditions than those…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Risley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ford v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Kasofsky v. MonahanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
- Sokolski v. BleistiftAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911