Legal Opinion

Kasofsky v. Monahan

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 24, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant, and judgment directed for the plaintiff for the sum of $197.50, with appropriate costs in the court below.

The uncontradicted proof is to the effect that the plaintiff was hired to sell property which was represented to be 20 feet in width by 100 feet in depth. The plaintiff produced a purchaser who was ready, willing and able to buy the property in question, which was stated by the defendant to be 20 feet in width by 100 feet in depth'. The failure to consummate the transaction was due to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davidson v. . StockyNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Keough v. MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Sokolski v. BleistiftAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beckmann, Inc. v. (Zinke's) Rainbow's EndNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API