Legal Opinion
Wirtz v. Ti Ti Peat Humus Co.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided January 14, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 7953PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, District Judge.
Plaintiff instituted this action to enjoin defendant from violating the provisions of Section 15(a) (1) and 15(a) (2) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the Act. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to Section 17 of the Act.
In his complaint plaintiff alleges that defendant has heretofore employed and is now employing approximately six employees in and about its place of business at a locality known as Green Pond in Col-leton County, South Carolina, in mining, pulverizing, processing, and otherwise…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Walling v. General Industries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Frozen Food ExpressSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Mitchell v. BuddSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Fleming v. PhippsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Atlas Roofing Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Ti Ti Peat Humus Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967