Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Pozarelli

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1964No. Civ. 27729PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. †

Plaintiffs Sweeney, husband and wife, appeal from an adverse judgment following jury trial of their action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received through negligence of defendants Albert Pozarelli and Hugh Neville in “a three-way rear end automobile accident” (quoting pretrial conference order).

The accident happened in Los Angeles on the Hollywood Freeway near the main interchange, the three ears being in the middle lane and headed easterly. The other two cars were following that of Sweeney and in immediate sequence. Plaintiffs’ Cadillac was first,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Dierman v. Providence HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Gagosian v. Burdick's Television & AppliancesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Mann v. Columbia Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Estate of RowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Getas v. HookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API