Management Television Systems, Inc. v. National Football League
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FULLAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff has brought suit under the antitrust laws naming as defendants the National Football League, sixteen member clubs of the League and three national television networks. Plaintiff claims to operate closed circuit television systems and alleges that the named defendants, along with other football clubs who are members of the National Football League, have conspired to exclude plaintiff from the market for televising professional football games by refusing to deal with it, and have conspired to allocate the markets for such television.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. LangerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Calagaz v. CalhoonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- Research Corp. v. Pfister Associated Growers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Freedman v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Pennsylvania Ass'n for Retarded Children v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Curley v. Brignoli, Curley & Roberts AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- In re the Gap Stores Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Thillens, Inc. v. Community Currency Exchange Ass'n of Illinois, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.