Legal Opinion

State v. Dinkins

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 18, 2010No. 2009AP1643-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHigginbotham, J.

¶ 1. William Dinkins was convicted of first-degree sexual assault of a child and is therefore subject to the requirements of Wisconsin's sex offender registration law. See Wis. Stat. § 301.45(ld)(b) and (lg)(a) (2007-08).1 This appeal concerns his conviction for failing to provide the Department of Corrections (department) "the address at which [he] . . . w[ould] be residing" at least ten days prior to his release from prison, pursuant to § 301.45(2)(a)5. and (e)4.

*594¶ 2. Dinkins' primary contention, as we construe it, is that he could not be convicted of failing to provide his post-release…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. BolligWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. State v. KleserWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Twine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DinkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  3. State v. PolarCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API