State v. Dinkins
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtHigginbotham, J.
¶ 1. William Dinkins was convicted of first-degree sexual assault of a child and is therefore subject to the requirements of Wisconsin's sex offender registration law. See Wis. Stat. § 301.45(ld)(b) and (lg)(a) (2007-08).1 This appeal concerns his conviction for failing to provide the Department of Corrections (department) "the address at which [he] . . . w[ould] be residing" at least ten days prior to his release from prison, pursuant to § 301.45(2)(a)5. and (e)4.
*594¶ 2. Dinkins' primary contention, as we construe it, is that he could not be convicted of failing to provide his post-release…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BolligWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State v. KleserWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Twine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. DinkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- State v. PolarCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013