Legal Opinion

Kimm v. Rosenberg

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 13, 1960No. 139PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner applied for suspension of an order directing his deportation to Korea or permitting his voluntary departure. He does not question the validity of the deportation order, but contends that he is within the eligible statutory class whose deportation may be suspended at the discretion of the Attorney General. § 19 (c) of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended. Relief on this score was denied on the basis that the Attorney General has no power to exercise his discretion in *406that regard since petitioner failed to prove his eligibility under that section and the Internal Security Act of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jay v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. United States Ex Rel. Hintopoulos v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Diamond Kimm v. Richard C. Hoy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Cymaticolor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  5. Navinchandra Mafatlal Jarecha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API