Barnett v. Bryce Furnace Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Fulton Circuit Court; A. G. Capron, Judge. Action by Moses Barnett and others against the Bryce Furnace Company to cancel a contract. From a judgment for defendant on demurrer to complaint, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The court below sustained a demurrer for want of sufficient facts to the complaint of the appellants against the appellee. In their complaint the appellants sought a judgment annulling a certain written contract alleged to have been entered into by the parties. The contract was not set out in the complaint, nor were its contents therein recited, nor was the substance thereof stated; but the written contract was referred to in the complaint as an exhibit thereto attached; and the form of a written contract is set out in the ¡ transcript as an exhibit to the complaint.
*89The suit was not founded…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Knight v. Flatrock & Waldron Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Johnson v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Price v. BaylessIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Wabash Valley Protective Union v. JamesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Liggett v. LozierIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by1 opinion
- Southern Railway Co. v. City of HuntingburghIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924