Legal Opinion

Corpuz v. Walmart, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 10, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00901Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDISON CORPUZ, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00901-RBM-AHG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT 13 v. WALMART INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT 14 WALMART, INC. 15 Defendant. 16 [Doc. 7] 17 18 On September 2, 2022, Defendant Walmart, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed a Motion to 19 Dismiss Complaint (“Motion”). (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff Edison Corpuz (“Plaintiff”) filed an 20 opposition on September 26, 2022 (Doc. 10), and Defendant filed a reply on October 10, 21 2022 (Doc. 11). For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion is…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API