Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Vandermast
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided August 14, 2020No. 3:20-cv-03024Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HARRISON DIVISION SCOTT HAMMOND PLAINTIFF Vv. CASE NO. 3:20-CV-03024 NEUBACH VANDERMAST DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Scott Hammond filed his complaint in this action on March 18, 2020, and Defendant Neubach Vandermast answered. No motions were filed, and the Court set a Rule 16 Case Management Hearing for May 29, 2020. After reviewing the pleadings and the parties’ joint Rule 26(f) report, the Court sua sponte directed the parties to file simultaneous briefing on the issue of whether the Court should abstain…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aar International, Incorporated v. Nimelias Enterprises S.A., Vacances Heliades S.A. And Princess Airlines S.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- James R. Laduke v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.