Legal Opinion

Stokes v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 25, 1999No. A99A0572PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, Timothy Tyrone Stokes was convicted in a bench trial of trafficking in cocaine. His motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals, asserting that his motion to suppress should have been granted. Because the officers who approached Stokes did not go beyond the permissible scope of inquiry, we affirm.

When an appellate court reviews a trial court’s order concerning a motion to suppress evidence, the appellate court should be guided by three principles with regard to the interpretation of the trial court’s judgment of the facts.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. McClain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Pickens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. State v. WestmorelandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Moran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Brittian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Akins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. State v. CauseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. State v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API