Akins v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Barnes, Judge.
James Akins appeals his conviction of possessing cocaine, contending that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
A trial judge who hears a motion to suppress sits as the trier of facts. Tate v. State, 264 Ga. 53, 54 (1) (440 SE2d 646) (1994). The judge’s decision regarding questions of fact and credibility must be accepted unless clearly erroneous and should not be disturbed by a reviewing court if any evidence supports it. Id. A reviewing court must construe the evidence most favorably to upholding the trial court’s findings…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- McClain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- State v. FolkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Stokes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- McAdoo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Abernathey v. Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. PattersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Cutter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- State v. NaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Mauge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.