Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Sanders

New York Family Court

Decided June 16, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSicher, J.

In this proceeding for a support order respondent challenges, not without at least colorable basis, the primary allegation that petitioner is in law his wife.

Upon filing of the petition on January 30, 1942 there was ordered the customary Probation Bureau investigation and report (Dom. Rel. Ct. Act, §§ 31,128). On February 3, 1942 respondent appeared *721by attorney and assistant corporation counsel Trubin represented petitioner, there was entered a temporary order (without prejudice) for fifteen dollars, semi-monthly beginning February 6, 1942, and the case scheduled for trial on February 24,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Loomis v. LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. In re ButtlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. In Re the Estate of CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Varney v. VarneyNew York Family Court · 1942
  5. Costa v. CostaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Horner v. HornerNew York Family Court · 1944
  2. Hughes v. HughesNew York City Family Court · 1968
  3. Boone v. BooneNew York Family Court · 1947
  4. People v. GoldsteinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1974
  5. Johnston v. JohnstonNew York Family Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API