Horner v. Horner

There are presented for determination (1) an unusual form of the recurrent problem of the relations between Family Court support proceedings and Supreme Court matrimonial litigation, and (2) whether, under the particular circumstances, there should be a present exercise of the Family Court’s circumscribed power to order visitation; (N. Y. City Dom. Rel. Ct. Act, § 92, subds. 7, 8; L. 1933, ch. 482.)

- Petitioner is a New York City public school teacher, and respondent the resident dentist of an up-State institution for mental defectives. They married on December 8, 1932, and are the parents of…