Legal Opinion

Paull v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 17, 1982No. 81 C 5871PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Jeffrey M; Pauli (“Pauli”) brought this action on behalf of himself and others similarly situated alleging that defendants Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. (“Fireside”) and Chrysler Credit Corporation (“Chrysler”) violated the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1631 and 1638, and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, 1 by failing to properly disclose certain items in a retail installment contract Pauli signed in connection with his purchase of a 1981 Mazda RX-7 from Fireside. This matter is presently before the Court on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Anderson Bros. Ford v. ValenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Patterson v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steven P. Streit v. Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Shields v. Lefta, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  3. Jeffrey M. Paull v. Chrysler Credit Corporation, and Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Slover-Becker v. Pitre Chrysler Plymouth Jeep of Scottsdale, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API