Legal Opinion
Slover-Becker v. Pitre Chrysler Plymouth Jeep of Scottsdale, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided November 9, 2005No. CIV04-1736PHX-JWSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
[Re: Motions at Docket 32 and 36]
SEDWICK, District Judge.
I. MOTIONS PRESENTED
At docket 32 defendant Pitre Chrysler Plymouth Jeep of Scottsdale, Inc. (“Pitre”) has moved for summary judgment. At docket 36 plaintiff Christina Slover-Becker (“Becker”) has opposed Pitre’s motion and cross-moved for summary judgment. The matter has been fully briefed. Neither party has requested oral argument, and it would not assist the court.
II. BACKGROUND/FACTS
This action arises out of Becker’s purchase of a 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML320 from Pitre under a Retail Installment Sales Contract (“RISC”)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bledsoe Dodge, L.L.C. v. Kuberski, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- Gregory v. Metro Auto Sales, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016