Legal Opinion

Finnemore v. Alaska Steamship Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1942No. 28578Published

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was instituted in the superior court for King county, by Herbert Finnemore, to recover, from the Alaska Steamship Company, damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by plaintiff through defendant’s negligence. No statement of facts or bill of exceptions has been certified to this court, and we have before us only the transcript of the record. The case was tried to the court without a jury, and after the hearing the court made and entered findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment.

There being no statement of facts before us, we accept as the facts in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Williams v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Coyle v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
  4. Seckler v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  5. Grubb Ex Rel. Grubb v. Kansas City Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API