Legal Opinion

State v. McClean

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 23, 2016No. AC37380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavine, J.

The defendant, Michael McClean, appeals from the trial court's judgment of dismissal of his motion to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court erred by dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence after concluding that his sentence did not violate the eighth amendment to the United States constitution, as explicated by Miller v. Alabama, --- U.S. ----, 132 S.Ct. 2455 , 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). 1 We conclude that the trial court improperly determined that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the defendant's motion, but correctly concluded that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Semple v. CasianoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. State v. Williams-BeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dumas v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  2. State v. YatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. State v. McCleanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API