State v. Yates
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.
The defendant, John Yates, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant claims on appeal that the court improperly (1) permitted appointed counsel to withdraw without first requiring him to articulate the reasoning behind his determination that there was no sound basis for the motion to correct an illegal sentence, and (2) concluded that his sentence had not been imposed in an illegal manner. We conclude that only the form of the judgment is improper, and, accordingly, we reverse the judgment dismissing the defendant's motion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. HueySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LynchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. HudsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. SaltersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018