Legal Opinion

Klar v. Erie Rd. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1928No. 20588PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The question is presented whether under the undisputed facts disclosed by the record the plaintiff may recover from the defendants, or either of them. The action of the plaintiff is based upon the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, and is instituted and maintained upon the theory that at the time of the injury he was engaged.in interstate commerce. It therefore becomes a matter of first concern to determine whether the relationship was such that the provisions of that act have any application to this case.

The car in question, loaded with coal, came into the yards of the Erie Railroad Company…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gillum v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State ex rel. Nese v. State Teachers Retirement Bd. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. PremeauxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Industrial Commission v. McAdowOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Lees v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API