Legal Opinion

State v. Beck

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 19, 1971No. 177-3PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

Defendants, Michael R. Beck and William F. Lukenbill, were charged by information with the crime of grand larceny. In essence both defendants were charged with receiving, concealing, and aiding in the concealment of certain copper and brass wire of a value in excess of $75 on or about November 26, 1968, knowing it to have been stolen. Both defendants were convicted. Only defendant Beck appeals.

First, Beck contends the trial court erred in refusing to grant a motion to dismiss at the close of the prosecution’s case. When Beck elected to proceed and present evidence in his own defense, he…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. EtheridgeWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. DouglasWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. PorteeWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. State v. TanzymoreWashington Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MacEWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. LadelyWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. KnottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. State v. PisauroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  5. State v. SmythCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API