Legal Opinion

State v. Etheridge

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1968No. 39700PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Armstrong, J. †

The defendant, Jack Etheridge, and his wife, Joyice, were charged by information with two counts of grand larceny by check. Count two was dismissed on a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence and we are not here concerned with it. The jury found the defendant, Jack Etheridge, guilty of count one. The following facts are pertinent to his appeal from the judgment entered by the trial court.

In late November, 1966, defendant and his wife moved to this state from the state of Virginia, after a 2-month stopover in Florida. In December, 1966, defendant’s wife opened a bank…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. FouquetteNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Midgett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. The People v. NashIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. J-R Distributors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Quinn v. Cherry Lane Auto Plaza, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. PayneWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. CrudupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API