Legal Opinion

Hill Brothers Chemical Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 2004No. B175433PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DOI TODD, J.

Hill Brothers Chemical Company (Hill Brothers), defendant in a wrongful death action, petitions for relief from the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment. The issue before us is whether Hill Brothers, licensed as a private motor carrier under the Vehicle Code, has a nondelegable duty to the public and is therefore liable for the negligent acts of a for-hire motor carrier of property it hired as an independent contractor to transport its goods. We find no such duty and grant the petition for writ of mandate.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Hill Brothers, a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Fonseca v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Edward Fineman Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Eli v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Twedt v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Farm General Insurance v. FrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. City of San Diego v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Vargas v. FMI, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Wilson v. IESI N.Y. Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. People v. Mireles, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API