Legal Opinion
Edward Fineman Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 2, 1998No. B122497PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.
In the present matter we review the trial court’s order of summary adjudication that a bank customer’s claim for damages based on the bank’s payment of checks issued from 1991 through 1993 containing less than all of the required signatures is barred by the retroactive application of California Uniform Commercial Code1 sections 4111 and 4406, subdivision (f).
We issued an order to show cause and set the matter for hearing. Having reviewed the pleadings and record and having heard oral argument, we deny the relief requested.
Factual Background
The Edward Fineman Company…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Hubbard v. BoeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Lilienthal & Fowler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Basch v. Bank of Am. Nat'l Tr. & Sav. Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Roy Supply, Inc. v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Mann v. Quality Old Time Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Hughes Electronics Corp. v. Citibank DelawareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Silva v. See's Candy Shops, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Beroiz v. WahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.