Legal Opinion
United States v. Samuel J. Concemi, United States of America v. Walter Ribeck
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 16, 1992No. 91-1241, 91-1249PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
On October 2, 1990, a federal grand jury returned a 35 Count indictment charging defendants/appellants, Samuel J. Concemi (“Concemi”), Walter Ribeck (“Ribeck”) and non-appellant Patricia A. Hajjar (“Hajjar”), with one count of conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, 17 counts of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, 17 counts of making false statements to a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2, aiding and abetting bank fraud and false statements. The jury returned verdicts of guilty on all counts on…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Ruben Ortiz, A/K/A Ruben Ortiz De Jesus, United States of America v. Felix Nunez, A/K/A Felix Nunez MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. DardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. InnamoratiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Robert F. Carrozza, United States of America v. Raymond J. Patriarca, United States of America v. Raymond J. PatriarcaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.