Legal Opinion

Hale Bros. v. Milliken

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1907No. Civ. No. 258Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. W. P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion

We have given the petition for a rehearing of this cause careful consideration, and are unable to discover any reason for changing our views, as expressed in the main opinion, upon the questions discussed. It may be suggested that, since filing the original opinion in this case, there has come to our notice the recent case of Leonhart v. CaliforniaWine Assn., ante, p. 19, [89 P. 847], in which the court of the first appellate district discusses at some length the question of the resort to a custom or usage of trade for the purpose of interpreting the language of a written or other express…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Withers v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Higgins v. California Petroleum & Asphalt Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Leonhart v. California Wine Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API