Legal Opinion

People v. Dixon

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2000No. 99CA1179PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NIETO.

Defendant, James Earl Dixon, appeals the judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of unlawful possession of a schedule II controlled substance. On appeal, defendant's sole claim is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as the result of an allegedly unlawful search. We reverse the order and the judgment, and we remand for further proceedings.

The following evidence elicitéd at the suppression hearing forms the factual basis for this appeal.

An undercover police officer testified that he and a second…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. GonzalezIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. MelgosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Jamal Williams, AKA Jamal AbdullahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. People v. TaylorColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. People v. RushdoonyColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. In re A.BColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. People ex rel. A.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API