Legal Opinion

People v. Rushdoony

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 2004No. 03CA0490PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge VOGT.

Defendant, Washakie Rushdoony, appeals the judgment of conviction entered on a jury-verdict finding him guilty of possession of a schedule II controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We disagree and therefore affirm.

A deputy sheriff patrolling at about 3:30 a.m. near a strip mall that had been the site of recent burglaries saw defendant and a companion rummaging through a dumpster behind an electrical business in the mall. The deputy testified at the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Lykes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. People v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BrantSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. People v. CouillardColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. People v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. HarbisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API