Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Mayfield Heights v. Bartunek

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1967No. 28678PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArtl, J.

This is an action originating in this court wherein relator seeks a writ of prohibition against the respondent exercising jurisdiction in a matter pending in his court. The facts are set forth in relator’s petition for the writ and are as follows:

Relator says that the respondent, Joseph W. Bartunek, is one. of the duly elected, qualified and acting Judges of the Probate Court of Cuyahoga County, Ohio; that relator is the city of Mayfield Heights, Ohio, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under and pursuant to the laws of the state of Ohio and brings this action on behalf of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Foreman v. Bellefontaine Municipal CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Henle v. City of EuclidOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Dayton Street Transit Co. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. In Re Estate of MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Kane v. KaneOhio Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,642 Miguel A. Gargallo v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. And Larry W. TyreeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. In Interest of AEHWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Kinney v. Ohio Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Masheter v. Mariemont, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. P.C. v. C.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API