Legal Opinion

Van Lydegraf v. Tyler

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, C. J.

Despondent moves to dismiss the appeal of the defendants, Oscar H. Zeller and Marie L. Zeller, upon two grounds: first, that Vernon O. Tyler, one of the defendants who was not served with a notice of appeal was, within the meaning of Section 550, Or. L., an adverse party to Ms appealing co-defendants, and, second that the notice of appeal was not sufficient to describe the decree appealed from with reasonable certainty. We find no merit in either contention.

1, 2. The object of the suit was the foreclosure of three mechanics’ liens. The complaint alleged that the defendant Tyler was the record…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Pacific Packing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Cox v. TerritorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ward v. TOWN TAVERNOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Perry v. MountOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Dimitre Electric Co. v. PagetOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Heider v. UnicumeOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Weith v. KleinOregon Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API