Legal Opinion

Harbin v. Harde

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1940No. Appeal, 146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The land, the subject of this partition proceeding, was owned by Frank Joseph Harde in his lifetime and on his death descended to his heirs, of whom defendant Anthony Harde was one. The interests of three other heirs, in the land, was purchased on January 15, 1938 by plaintiff Rose' Harbin; she was not an heir of decedent and her entire interest in the land was acquired by purchase. The bill, in this her action for partition pf the land, was taken pro confesso and a decree of partition was entered. A master was then appointed by the court and in response to the master’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eyerman v. Detwiller, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1890
  2. Klohs v. ReifsnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  3. Whitman v. O'Connor, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Venango County1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Billings v. BillingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
  2. Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  3. Beall v. HareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API