Legal Opinion

Beall v. Hare

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1961No. Appeals, 107, 108, 124 and 156PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

These appeals question the legal correctness of the decree of the court below in an action of partition.

Euphemia S. South died testate on March 18, 1934, seised of improved farm land of approximately 43 acres. By her will she devised a life interest therein to her husband, since deceased, and the remainder in equal shares to her five children, Alice S. Beall, Edna S. Sander, Lula S. Morris, Cora S. Hare and Frank Lee South. Cora S. Hare subsequently died and by will devised her interest to her husband, James F. Hare, Sr., for life and the remainder to her son,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. CondranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Harbin v. HardeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bargo v. KuhnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  3. In re KasychSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Forkal, M. v. Forkal, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Quarello, J. v. Clinger, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API