Legal Opinion
Leo Louis Kaczmar, III v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 31, 2017No. SC13-2247PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
Leo Louis Kaczmar, III, appeals his sentence of death imposed after a new penalty phase proceeding. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the following reasons, we affirm Kaez-mar’s sentence of death.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS
We previously set forth the relevant facts in Kaczmar v. State, 104 So.3d 990, 995-98 (Fla. 2012). Kaczmar was convicted for first-degree murder, attempted sexual battery, and arson. During Kaezmar’s first penalty phase, the parties stipulated that Kaczmar had been previously convicted of a robbery. Id. at 997. The State presented a victim…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Michael Gordon Reynolds v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- Eric Scott Branch v. State of Florida & SC18-218 Eric Scott Branch v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
- In Re: Standard Criminal Jury Instructions in Capital CasesSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- Margaret A. Allen v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2019
- Sampson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.