Legal Opinion

People v. Baeske

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1976No. Crim. 27671PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JEFFERSON (Bernard), J.

By information defendant Baeske was charged with robbery in violation of Penal Code section 211. It was alleged that defendant was armed with a deadly weapon at the time of the commission of the offense within the meaning of Penal Code sections 3024 and 12022. It was also alleged that defendant used a firearm within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022.5.

Defendant, represented by a deputy public defender, entered a plea of not guilty. Trial was by jury. The jury found defendant guilty of robbery, 1 and further found that defendant had used a firearm during the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. SearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. GuzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. People v. BeyeaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Behr v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. BonillasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Jazayeri v. MaoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API