Legal Opinion
Deemer v. Silk City Textile MacH. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 16, 1984PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
193 N.J. Super. 643 (1984)
475 A.2d 648
PATRICIA JEAN DEEMER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF JERRY T. DEEMER, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
SILK CITY TEXTILE MACHINERY CO., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND ANTHONY INCANNO, INDIVIDUALLY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 7, 1984.
Decided March 16, 1984.
Before Judges MICHELS, KING and DREIER.
V. Vincent Velardo argued the cause for appellants (Velardo & Koprowski, attorneys; V. Vincent Velardo, of counsel; Joseph T. Delgado, on the brief).
David M. Paris argued…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Smith v. Fiber Controls Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Pfau v. Trent Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Gantes v. Kason Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Caldwell v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- D'AGOSTINO v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Rowe v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- In re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.