Legal Opinion

Menard v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 24, 2012No. 12-1155PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

Mark Menard and Carol Menard appeal from a district court order dismissing their complaint for failure to state a claim and denying their motion to amend the complaint. Mark Menard, whom we refer to as “Menard,” was permanently injured while crossing through a railroad freight yard; the district court ruled that his complaint against CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSX”) failed to assert sufficient facts to overcome his status as a “trespasser” and thereby state a claim under Massachusetts law.

Menard’s version of the accident, which we accept as true for purposes of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. García-Catalán v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  2. Saldivar v. RacineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  3. Parker v. LandryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  4. Garcia-Catalan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. Gianfrancesco v. Town of WrenthamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API