Dickerson, Inc. v. Board of Transportation
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Much argument has been directed toward the trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. This Court has held that ordinarily the denial of a motion for summary judgment does not affect a substantial right so that an appeal may be taken. Stonestreet v. Motors, Inc., 18 N.C. App. 527, 197 S.E. 2d 579 (1973) ; Motyka v. Nappier, 9 N.C. App. 579, 176 S.E. 2d 858 (1970). We will not consider the trial court’s failure to grant summary judgment in plaintiff’s favor.
The sole question for determination is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whitley v. CubberlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Nat Harrison Associates, Inc. v. North Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- LA Reynolds Company v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Motyka v. NappierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Stonestreet v. Compton Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by3 opinions
- Durham v. VineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- APAC-Carolina, Inc. v. Greensboro-High Point Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Triad Bank v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990