Legal Opinion
Elmendorf v. Howell
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided May 5, 1997No. 1:95-cv-01613PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McAVOY, Chief Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
On February 18, 1997, plaintiff moved for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule 56 asserting that she was entitled to a due process hearing prior to her termination as a tenured school principal, and that as a matter of law she was entitled to the position of Assistant Superintendent for the Windham-Ashland-Jewett Central School District. On that same date, the defendants, in their official and individual capacities, cross-moved pursuant to Federal Rule 12(b)(6), dismissing the plaintiffs complaint, and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Emma v. Schenectady City School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Winslow v. Pulaski Academy and Central School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020