Legal Opinion

Gormley v. Robertson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 3, 2004No. 21580-6-IIIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKato, J.

— This appeal involves the division of property after the intimate domestic relationship ended between two single women, Lynn Gormley and Julia Robertson, who had cohabitated for some 10 years. The trial court applied the meretricious relationship doctrine to this same-sex couple in dividing their assets and liabilities. We affirm.

Between July 1988 and August 1998, Ms. Gormley and Dr. Robertson lived together. Both were lieutenant commanders in the Navy when they met. Dr. Robertson is a physician; Ms. Gormley is a nurse and administrator. They began their relationship having nearly equal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Robel v. Roundup Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Connell v. FranciscoWashington Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Carvin v. BritainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API