Legal Opinion

Lithgow v. Pearson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1913No. 3723PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Denver District Court. Hon'. G-eobge W. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, Presiding Judge.

In the view we take of this case it is only necessary to determine one of the contentions debated in the briefs and on oral argument, viz.: whether or not, under the statutes of our state, a right of way acquired by a railroad corporation by condemnation reverts to the original owner of the fee upon the same being abandoned by the corporation.. Wherever the word “abandonment” appears in this opinion, we use it in the sense that the condemnor acquiring title to the land by condemnation for a public purpose has ceased to use it for such purposes. It is not necessary,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Fairchild v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Clayton v. Chicago, Iowa & Dakota R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Smith Canal or Ditch Co. v. Colorado Ice & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  5. Pueblo & Arkansas Valley R. R. v. RuddSupreme Court of Colorado · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Radetsky v. JorgensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  2. Bear Creek Development Corp. v. Genesee FoundationColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Henry v. Columbus Depot Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Agricultural Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. GleasonColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Steamboat Lake Water & Sanitation District v. HalvorsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API