Legal Opinion

Agricultural Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. Gleason

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1984No. 81CA1098PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERMAN, Judge.

Plaintiff, Agricultural Ditch and Reservoir Company, commenced this action against defendants in order to quiet title to certain property. Plaintiff company asserts that it acquired in “limited fee,” through an 1876 condemnation proceeding, a piece of land (Parcel A) 40 feet wide, consisting of two strips 20 feet wide along each side of the centerline of a ditch. Plaintiff also claims a prescriptive easement on an additional strip of land (Parcel B), running adjacent to and abutting Parcel A for an additional 5 to 10 feet, 1 which land plaintiff has regularly used as an access…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Trueblood v. PierceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  3. McCotter v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Shellow v. HagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Lovejoy v. School Dist. No. 46 of Sedgwick CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wright v. Horse Creek RanchesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Hutson v. Agricultural Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Clinger v. HartshornColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Alexander v. McClellanColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Irvin v. BrandColorado Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API