Legal Opinion

Moss v. South Carolina State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 13, 1953No. 16732PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baker, Chief Justice.

Injunctive relief is the sole relief sought in this action.

The complaint alleges, among other things, that the appellant owns a lot in the City of Orangeburg upon which there is situated a large and valuable residence; that she has expended large sums of money having the said lot landscaped and that the property has little value for purposes other than residential purposes. That the respondent has announced plans for and is threatening to relocate U. S. Highway No. 301 through the City of Orangeburg and has laid out and staked off a right-of-way therefor ninety feet wide…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chick Springs Water Co. v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  2. Gasque v. Town of ConwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. Henderson v. City of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  4. Milhous v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sease v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Campbell v. Bolen (In Re Caudy Custom Builders, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
  3. Corbin v. CHEROKEE REALTY CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Early v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  5. Knohl v. Duke Power CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API