Hargadine McKittrick Dry Goods Co. v. Goodman
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by Division B. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Escambia County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
—The plaintiff in error as plaintiff below sued the defendant in error in the circuit court of Escambia county in an action of assumpsit, the declaration being as follows: “The plaintiff sues the defendant for money payable by the defendant to the plaintiff for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered by the plaintiff to a late co-partnership known as Gray & Goodman and composed of the defendant and one Paul Gray, who died *362prior to the institution of this suit; and the plaintiff claims $4,000.00.”
To this declaration the defendant filed the following plea: “That after the accrual of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crawford v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Wright v. TerrySupreme Court of Florida · 1887
- Union Stove & Machine Works v. CaswellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Hunter v. Wilson, Stearly & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1885
- J. R. Tysen & Co. v. SomervilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Capital National Bank of Tampa, Cross-Appellant v. J.A. Hutchinson, Jr., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Travis v. Central Surety & Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Fusco v. City of Union CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Burge v. MaundSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
- Arthus Bertrand, S.A. v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994