Legal Opinion

J. R. Tysen & Co. v. Somerville

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the’Circuit Court for Duval county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, J.:

W. M. Somerville, the appellee, sued the appellants,. J. R. Tysen and Samuel Barton, partners under the firm name of J. R. Tysen & Co., in an action of assumpsit in the Circuit Court of Duval county, and recovered judgment for one hundred dollars, from which J. R. Tysen & Co. appeal.

The declaration alleges that on the first day of January, 1888, a certain firm, composed of J. R. Tysen,. C. B. Smith and Samuel Barton, doing business in Duval county under the firm name of Tysen, Smith & Co., was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum. of five hundred dollars for labor and services of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HanrahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Ford v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Regester v. DodgeUnited States Circuit Court · 1881

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martyn v. J. E. Amold & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
  2. Watt v. German Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1917
  3. Sans Souci v. DIV. OF FLA. LAND SALES AND CONDOMINIUMSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Prucha v. Guarantee Reserve Life Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Badders v. Checker Cab & Baggage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API