Legal Opinion
Mannino v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 6, 1983No. Civ. 30085PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSBY, Acting P. J.
Petitioner Mannino seeks review of the denial without prejudice of his motion to compel Southern California Edison Company (Edison) to answer his sixth set of interrogatories without objection and his request for sanctions.
Mannino’s personal injury action was scheduled for trial on February 7, 1983. On September 21, 1982, he propounded a set of 190 interrogatories. At Edison’s request, on October 18, 1982, Mannino’s counsel granted an extension to November 24, 1982, to respond. A verified response was finally served on November 30, 1982; it included objections to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- West Pico Furniture Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Zonver v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Monarch Healthcare v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Calcor Space Facility, Inc. v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Barnett v. American-Cal Medical Services, No. 1, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- People Ex Rel. Department of Fish & Game v. Attransco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Monarch Healthcare v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.