Hardy v. Bumpstead
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.
Plaintiffs in error are the record owners of the land in controversy and entitled to recover the same unless defendant in error has title under the ten-year statute of limitation.
In order to justify the conclusion that title has been perfected by defendant in error under the provisions of the ten-year statute (Rev. St. 1925, art. 5510), it must appear his possession and use of the land has been continuous and uninterrupted for the required period of time. If there is a break in the continuity of his possession, it devolves upon him to show that it only existed for a reasonable period. Dunn v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dunn v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Niday, Guardian v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Kimbro v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1866
- Cantagrel v. Von LupinTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Nona Mills Company v. L.P. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- McKee v. E. R. StewarTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Heard v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Greenway Parks Home Owners Ass'n v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Poenisch v. QuarnstromTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Bruch v. Benedict Barnes Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.